BrokerAudit

BrokerAudit may receive compensation from partners featured on this page. This does not influence our ratings. See our methodology.

FP Markets vs Pepperstone 2026

A detailed head-to-head comparison of FP Markets and Pepperstone across regulation, trading costs, platforms, and more.

FP Markets logo - BrokerAudit
FP Markets

Est. 2005 · Sydney, Australia

ASICCySECFSCA
83.4/100
Excellent
Pepperstone logo - BrokerAudit
Pepperstone

Est. 2010 · Melbourne, Australia

FCAASICDFSA
88.6/100
Excellent

Score Breakdown

RegulationCostsPlatformsAccountsDepositSupportEducation
FP MarketsPepperstone

Category-by-Category Winner

Category
FP Markets
Pepperstone
Regulation & Trust
82
90
Trading Costs
92
94
Platforms & Tools
90
95
Account Conditions
80
88
Deposit & Withdrawal
82
88
Customer Support
78
80
Education & Research
70
75
Overall Score
83.4
88.6

Detailed Comparison

Overview

Year Founded
2005
2010
Headquarters
Sydney, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Publicly Listed
Top Regulators
ASIC, CySEC, FSCA
FCA, ASIC, DFSA
Total Instruments
10,000
1,200

Trading Costs

EUR/USD Spread
0.10 pips
0.10 pips
GBP/USD Spread
0.40 pips
0.40 pips
USD/JPY Spread
0.30 pips
0.30 pips
Min. Deposit
$100
$0
Commission/Lot
$6.00
$7.00
Inactivity Fee
None
None

Platforms & Features

MetaTrader 4
MetaTrader 5
cTrader
TradingView
Copy Trading
API Trading
VPS Hosting
Demo Account
Islamic Account

Instruments

Forex Pairs
70
62
CFD Stocks
10,000
1,000
Indices
19
21
Commodities
8
34
Crypto CFDs
12
30

FP Markets vs Pepperstone: Our Analysis

Overall Verdict

With an overall score of 88.6/100 vs 83.4/100, Pepperstone edges out FP Markets by 5.2 points. This moderate gap suggests Pepperstone has an edge in several key areas.

Trading Costs

On the EUR/USD pair, FP Markets offers an average spread of 0.10 pips with a $6.00 round-turn commission, while Pepperstone comes in at 0.10 pips with a $7.00 commission. Both brokers offer identical EUR/USD spreads. Minimum deposit is $100 at FP Markets and $0 at Pepperstone.

Regulation & Safety

FP Markets holds 4 regulatory licenses with a highest tier of Tier 1 (ASIC, CySEC, FSCA), while Pepperstone has 6 licenses at Tier 1 (FCA, ASIC, DFSA). Pepperstone has more regulatory licenses overall.

Platform Comparison

Both FP Markets and Pepperstone offer the same platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView. Your choice here comes down to execution quality, spreads, and account conditions rather than platform availability.

Who Should Choose Which?

FP Markets suits traders wanting a wide instrument range, while Pepperstone is better for cost-conscious traders, beginners seeking education, traders who want advanced tools, traders who prioritize safety. Both brokers offer demo accounts, so you can test each before committing real funds.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on our testing, Pepperstone scores higher overall at 88.6/100 compared to FP Markets's 83.4/100. However, "better" depends on your priorities — FP Markets may be superior in specific categories like certain niche features.

Both brokers offer identical EUR/USD average spreads of 0.10 pips. Compare their GBP/USD and USD/JPY spreads in the detailed table above to spot differences.

Pepperstone scores higher for regulation and trust at 90/100, holding licenses from FCA, ASIC, DFSA. FP Markets scores 82/100 with ASIC, CySEC, FSCA.

For beginners, Pepperstone is the stronger choice with an education and research score of 75/100. It offers structured trading courses, webinars, and a free demo account. FP Markets scores 70/100 for education.

Yes, there is no restriction on having accounts with both FP Markets and Pepperstone simultaneously. Many experienced traders maintain accounts with multiple brokers to take advantage of each broker's strengths — for example, using one for its lower spreads on majors and another for its wider instrument range or better platform features.

NC

Reviewed by

Neil C

Neil C is a financial markets analyst and forex trading specialist with over 10 years of experience evaluating broker platforms, trading conditions, and regulatory frameworks. He has personally tested accounts with dozens of brokers and brings a data-driven methodology to every review.

Last updated: April 2026

Related Resources